soccer games today

I still remember watching the 2007 NBA Draft like it was yesterday, sitting in my college dorm room with friends who argued about whether Greg Oden or Kevin Durant should go first. As someone who's studied basketball analytics for over a decade now, I can confidently say this was one of the most fascinating draft decisions in modern NBA history. The Portland Trail Blazers ultimately selected Oden first overall, a choice that would become legendary for all the wrong reasons - and yet, this draft class ended up reshaping the entire league in ways nobody anticipated.

When I look back at that draft night, what strikes me most is how unanimous the consensus seemed around Oden. At 7 feet tall with a 7'4" wingspan and remarkable athleticism, he appeared destined for greatness. I recall one scout telling me, "He moves like a guard in a center's body." The statistics from his single college season at Ohio State were staggering - he averaged 15.7 points, 9.6 rebounds, and 3.3 blocks while shooting 61.6% from the field. Meanwhile, Kevin Durant, who went second to Seattle, had put up equally impressive numbers at Texas: 25.8 points and 11.1 rebounds per game. The debate wasn't really about talent - both were phenomenal - but about the timeless question of whether you build around a dominant big man or a versatile scorer.

What makes the 2007 first pick so memorable isn't just the players involved, but the context. The NBA was transitioning from post-dominated basketball to the pace-and-space era we see today. In retrospect, Portland's choice represented the last gasp of traditional basketball thinking. I've always believed that if the draft were held today, analytics would overwhelmingly favor Durant. Teams now value shooting and perimeter creation more than ever, but back then, the gravitational pull of a dominant center was too strong to resist.

The tragedy of Greg Oden's career makes this draft particularly poignant from my perspective. His knee issues began before he even played an NBA game, requiring microfracture surgery that cost him his entire rookie season. Over his NBA career, he would appear in just 105 games total. Meanwhile, Durant has become one of the greatest scorers in basketball history with 4 scoring titles, an MVP award, and 2 championships. The gap between their careers is so vast it's almost difficult to comprehend.

But here's what many people miss about the 2007 draft - its impact extends far beyond the Oden-Durant comparison. This draft class produced several other franchise-altering players. At pick 48, the Lakers selected Marc Gasol, who would become a Defensive Player of the Year and central to Memphis's grit-and-grind era. Al Horford went third to Atlanta and has remained productive into his late 30s. Even role players like Joakim Noah (9th pick), Jeff Green (5th), and Thaddeus Young (12th) have enjoyed long, impactful careers.

The quote from Coach Tiongco about team chemistry resonates deeply when I consider Portland's situation post-draft. "We are good naman as a team," he said, discussing the challenge of integrating new players. "Nabuo kami almost one week na lang ng league. Biglang nagdatingan 'yung mga trades. So 'yung chemistry, wala pa." This perfectly captures what Portland faced - they had built a promising young core with Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge, but the Oden selection, followed by various roster moves, never allowed proper chemistry to develop. As Tiongco noted about his own team's challenges, "Lapses lang naman lagi 'yung sa duluhan. So hopefully, 'yung mga rookies ko, mag-mature sila, makuha nila 'yung mga roles sa team namin." Portland never achieved that maturation with Oden, and it cost them what could have been a championship window.

From an organizational standpoint, the 2007 draft taught teams valuable lessons about risk assessment. Portland's medical staff reportedly had concerns about Oden's asymmetrical legs - one slightly longer than the other - but the team drafted him anyway. In today's NBA, teams employ entire departments dedicated to biomechanical analysis to prevent exactly this kind of miss. The financial impact was substantial too - Oden earned approximately $24 million in his NBA career, while Durant has earned over $350 million in salary alone, not including endorsements.

What I find most compelling about studying this draft years later is how it reflects broader patterns in talent evaluation. The fear of missing on a generational big man often overrides rational decision-making. We saw similar debates with Anthony Davis versus Damian Lillard in 2012, and to some extent with Victor Wembanyama last year. The difference is that today's teams have much more sophisticated tools to project both performance and durability.

The 2007 draft's legacy continues to influence how teams approach the draft today. The success of second-round picks like Gasol has led organizations to invest more in international scouting. The rise of players like Durant has accelerated the trend toward positionless basketball. And the cautionary tale of Oden has made teams more conservative with injury-prone prospects - think of how teams handled Joel Embiid's draft evaluation despite his obvious talent.

In my view, the true impact of the 2007 NBA Draft extends beyond basketball - it's become a case study in decision-making under uncertainty. Business schools now use it to teach concepts like opportunity cost and sunk cost fallacy. The draft reminds us that sometimes the most obvious choice isn't the right one, and that contextual factors - like the evolving style of play - matter as much as individual talent. Fifteen years later, I still find myself referring to this draft when discussing player evaluation with colleagues, not just for what it taught us about basketball, but for what it revealed about human judgment itself.